On 28/11/2007, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the
reasons for blocking
> someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration
> Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in
support of this power grab?
It's the way things have run for a while now. Your use of "power grab"
doesn't make sense here - the ArbCom is a scaling of Jimbo, who used
to deal with difficult cases all on his own.
- d.