On 27/11/2007, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 3:28 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote: Right there you have pretty much defined the boundaries of a full-on witch hunt.
Not remotely. You are free to make no attempt to find out what happened.
Do you really want to be doing that?
Do you really believe that those assuming good faith are trying to cover up what happened?
I never suggested that. Even those attempting to stifle questions are probably acting in good faith. They are still wrong in their approach mind.
You see back when this started the debate was over if it was acceptable to refuse to answer to anyone below arbcom. Hanging Durova out to dry does not answer this question.
You see some oldtimers may remember some stuff about answering to the community. Obviously dead and buried. For a while it looked like admins might at least have to answer to other admins. If we are to abandon that? Who then should we answer to? Arbcom only? Closed mailing lists? To actively oppose investigation means that you are moving towards the position of answering to no one.