On 27/11/2007, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 3:28 PM, geni
<geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Right there you have pretty much defined the boundaries of a full-on witch
hunt.
Not remotely. You are free to make no attempt to find out what happened.
Do you really want to be doing that?
Do you really believe that those assuming good faith are trying to cover up
what happened?
I never suggested that. Even those attempting to stifle questions are
probably acting in good faith. They are still wrong in their approach
mind.
You see back when this started the debate was over if it was
acceptable to refuse to answer to anyone below arbcom. Hanging Durova
out to dry does not answer this question.
You see some oldtimers may remember some stuff about answering to the
community. Obviously dead and buried. For a while it looked like
admins might at least have to answer to other admins. If we are to
abandon that? Who then should we answer to? Arbcom only? Closed
mailing lists? To actively oppose investigation means that you are
moving towards the position of answering to no one.
--
geni