On 5/11/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Did you read the RFCs? Did you see the one where he was RFCd for actually *following* the deletion policy? (Quite literally, he was RFCd for not violating it the way a pile of people wanted it violated.)
Just out of curiosity, did that "pile of people" attempt to get that part of the deletion policy, whatever that was, changed or did they think their "pile" was large enough to constitute a consensus, consider the policy "changed", and file the RFC on Tony for not following the "new policy"?