On 5/11/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Did you read the RFCs? Did you see the one where he
was RFCd for
actually *following* the deletion policy? (Quite literally, he was
RFCd for not violating it the way a pile of people wanted it
violated.)
Just out of curiosity, did that "pile of people" attempt to get that
part of the deletion policy, whatever that was, changed or did they
think their "pile" was large enough to constitute a consensus,
consider the policy "changed", and file the RFC on Tony for not
following the "new policy"?