On 06/05/07, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
"I don't want to be number one on Google. This is the position I expressed to Brad Patrick over a year ago. I could live with a bio under those conditions. ... All it would take is a new flag in the system to generate a "noindex" meta in the header of certain articles. You wouldn't have to change robots.txt. It might be slightly easier than getting the article deleted, and it could be one option to offer BLP victims short of a deletion" (Brandt) Why not agree to this?
Some variant on this sounds plausible to me. Anyone see a serious problem with this?
- d.