On 06/05/07, doc <doc.wikipedia(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
"I don't want to be number one on Google.
This is the position I
expressed to Brad Patrick over a year ago. I could live with a bio under
those conditions. ... All it would take is a new flag in the system to
generate a "noindex" meta in the header of certain articles. You
wouldn't have to change robots.txt. It might be slightly easier than
getting the article deleted, and it could be one option to offer BLP
victims short of a deletion" (Brandt)
Why not agree to this?
Some variant on this sounds plausible to me. Anyone see a serious
problem with this?
- d.