The legal team doesn't seem to be worried as I thought they would react. There's nothing inappropriate about the article.
Mgm
On 3/26/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Ron Ritzman [mailto:ritzman@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 07:14 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Out of process deletions
On 3/26/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
The message that started this thread quoted a message from the Barbara
Bauer
situation. It may look and sound malicious to the untrained eye and ear
at
first glance, but anyone who dives deeper into the material will find
all of
the sources are truthfull and reliable.
The deleting admin didn't think so. If my idea was in effect and the foundation didn't have the Bauer article in limbo, then you, if an admin, could have restored it and that would have been the end of the story as far as super fast ultra-speedy deletes are concerned. The "truthfullness" and "reliability" of the sources could then be argued on AFD if necessary. Also, I have a hard time imagining a situation where it is absolutely impossible to purge POV from the bio of an otherwise notable person without nuking the article.
The "offending" information remains in the history without extensive oversighting which would be grossly inappropriate in this case as the article history is the subject of a legal action.
Fred
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l