The legal team doesn't seem to be worried as I thought they would react.
There's nothing inappropriate about the article.
Mgm
On 3/26/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ritzman [mailto:ritzman@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 07:14 AM
To: 'English Wikipedia'
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Out of process deletions
On 3/26/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The message that started this thread quoted a message from the Barbara
Bauer
> situation. It may look and sound malicious to
the untrained eye and ear
at
> first glance, but anyone who dives deeper
into the material will find
all of
the
sources are truthfull and reliable.
The deleting admin didn't think so. If my idea was in effect and the
foundation didn't have the Bauer article in limbo, then you, if an
admin, could have restored it and that would have been the end of the
story as far as super fast ultra-speedy deletes are concerned. The
"truthfullness" and "reliability" of the sources could then be argued
on AFD if necessary.
Also, I have a hard time imagining a situation where it is absolutely
impossible to purge POV from the bio of an otherwise notable person
without nuking the article.
The "offending" information remains in the history without extensive
oversighting which would be grossly inappropriate in this case as the
article history is the subject of a legal action.
Fred
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l