On 0, "C.J. Croy" cjcroy@gmail.com scribbled:
On 6/9/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
This is why several arbcom members have suggested banning the lot of you and are only slightly joking.
I offer the following templates if you should decide to follow through on that.
Principles: ===WAR! What is it good for?=== n) Wikipedia is not supposed to be a battleground, but sometimes it's turned into one. Like all wars, a WikiWar will will only end once the rivers run red with blood and every eye burns with tears.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' ::
:'''Comment by parties:''' ::
:'''Comment by others:''' ::
Findings of fact: ===Without redemption=== n) Every single involved party is irredeemable. No one, not even Jimbo or Jesus, believes they can be reformed into productive editors.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' ::
:'''Comment by parties:''' ::
:'''Comment by others:''' ::
Proposed remedies: ===Kill it with fire=== n} Every single involved party is indefinitely banned. Their talk and user pages are to be deleted and defiled as is most offensive to their personal belief system.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' ::
:'''Comment by parties:''' ::
:'''Comment by others:''' ::
No, no - you forgot the outside view's proposed remedy: ===Nuke it=== *I say we take off and nuke the entire bunch from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. ~~~
-- Gwern Inquiring minds want to know.