On 0, "C.J. Croy" <cjcroy(a)gmail.com> scribbled:
On 6/9/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This is why several arbcom members have suggested
banning the lot of
you and are only slightly joking.
I offer the following templates if you should decide to follow through on that.
Principles:
===WAR! What is it good for?===
n) Wikipedia is not supposed to be a battleground, but sometimes it's
turned into one. Like all wars, a WikiWar will will only end once the
rivers run red with blood and every eye burns with tears.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::
:'''Comment by parties:'''
::
:'''Comment by others:'''
::
Findings of fact:
===Without redemption===
n) Every single involved party is irredeemable. No one, not even
Jimbo or Jesus, believes they can be reformed into productive editors.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::
:'''Comment by parties:'''
::
:'''Comment by others:'''
::
Proposed remedies:
===Kill it with fire===
n} Every single involved party is indefinitely banned. Their talk and
user pages are to be deleted and defiled as is most offensive to their
personal belief system.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::
:'''Comment by parties:'''
::
:'''Comment by others:'''
::
No, no - you forgot the outside view's proposed remedy:
===Nuke it===
*I say we take off and nuke the entire bunch from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
~~~
--
Gwern
Inquiring minds want to know.