On 6/7/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 7 Jun 2007 at 04:46:31 +0100, "Tony Sidaway" tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
Because they're a useless bunch of wankers, possibly. I'd forgotten that they existed, and I'm sure most of us here had, too.
Which doesn't really explain why *that* useless bunch of wankers gets their own article, while *other* useless bunches of wankers get people insisting, with the temperament of a junkyard dog, that no reference to them may ever be permitted anywhere on Wikipedia.
Fourth time lucky perhaps....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wikitruth_%284t...
Is this an acceptable forum to discuss what has actually caused this ruckus, or does BADSITES apply to the mailing list as well?
-- John