On 6/7/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 7 Jun 2007 at 04:46:31 +0100, "Tony
Sidaway"
<tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Because they're a useless bunch of wankers,
possibly. I'd forgotten
that they existed, and I'm sure most of us here had, too.
Which doesn't really explain why *that* useless bunch of wankers gets
their own article, while *other* useless bunches of wankers get
people insisting, with the temperament of a junkyard dog, that no
reference to them may ever be permitted anywhere on Wikipedia.
Is this an acceptable forum to discuss what has actually caused this
ruckus, or does BADSITES apply to the mailing list as well?
--
John