On 7/12/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand. I'm talking about the details of where to mention the sources, and you're responding with what appears to be (you seem to have missed the end of the second sentence off in addition to some typos, so I'm guessing at what you're trying to say) an argument about not needing to cite common knowledge, which is another debate entirely. When making a counter argument, please make sure it is actually related to the original argument.
Where to cite has nothing to do with my original argument (apart from anything else citeing at the end only is largely meaningless since you can't tell what is and isn't cited).