On 7/12/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't understand. I'm talking about the
details of where to mention
the sources, and you're responding with what appears to be (you seem
to have missed the end of the second sentence off in addition to some
typos, so I'm guessing at what you're trying to say) an argument about
not needing to cite common knowledge, which is another debate
entirely. When making a counter argument, please make sure it is
actually related to the original argument.
Where to cite has nothing to do with my original argument (apart from
anything else citeing at the end only is largely meaningless since you
can't tell what is and isn't cited).
--
geni