On Dec 10, 2007 8:34 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 8:25 PM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 6:49 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/07, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
Relata Refero wrote:
The cyberstalking list saw the !! email, which contained a vast
error
of judgment, namely the implication that an obvious returning
account
was a disruptive returning account; that error of judgment was unchecked, in that nobody appeared to correct it prior to an (undiscussed on-list) block; the list appears to contain several respected editors.
The cyberstalking list was not a secret list, but a private list.
<snip>
Consulting privately with your friends is a *good thing*.
--Jimbo
Well, Jimbo...the fact that this particular block was discussed on the cyberstalking and harassment list is indeed significant to the person
who
Hello, Relata Refero! I thought people had stopped making this claim weeks ago. Care to step in and educate Risker as to the current party line?
OK - POSTED on the list. That everyone seems to be in agreement with. (Where I come from, we call that "discussed" because others make a decision whether or not to say anything.) And Jayjg if your name was posted on a list oriented to cyberstalking, I bet you'd be pretty humiliated too,
They posted !!'s name on the cyberstalking list? I didn't think anyone knew what it was.