On Dec 10, 2007 6:49 PM, Risker
<risker.wp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/10/07, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com>
wrote:
>
> Relata Refero wrote:
> > The cyberstalking list saw the !! email, which contained a vast
error
> > of judgment, namely the implication
that an obvious returning
account
> was
a disruptive returning account; that error of judgment was
> unchecked, in that nobody appeared to correct it prior to an
> (undiscussed on-list) block; the list appears to contain several
> respected editors.
The cyberstalking list was not a secret list, but a private list.
<snip>
Consulting privately with your friends is a *good thing*.
--Jimbo
Well, Jimbo...the fact that this particular block was discussed on the
cyberstalking and harassment list is indeed significant to the person
who
Hello, Relata Refero! I thought people had stopped making this claim
weeks ago. Care to step in and educate Risker as to the current party
line?
OK - POSTED on the list. That everyone seems to be in agreement with.
(Where I come from, we call that "discussed" because others make a decision
whether or not to say anything.) And Jayjg if your name was posted on a
list oriented to cyberstalking, I bet you'd be pretty humiliated too,