Thomas Dalton wrote:
I have no doubt that the usage would pass the fair use tests.
On what grounds? It's purely decorative. The list of purposes given my not be exhaustive, but it is intended to give a general idea of what kind of things are acceptable. Decoration does not fit into that general idea.
I suppose you're free to challenge Nokia on the basis of your theory that their usage is purely decorative. I suppose though we could expand the notion of fair use to anything where starting an action would make the plaintiff look silly. :-P
Ec