Thomas Dalton wrote:
I have no
doubt that the usage would pass the fair use tests.
On what grounds? It's purely decorative. The list of purposes given my
not be exhaustive, but it is intended to give a general idea of what
kind of things are acceptable. Decoration does not fit into that
general idea.
I suppose you're free to challenge Nokia on the basis of your
theory
that their usage is purely decorative. I suppose though we could expand
the notion of fair use to anything where starting an action would make
the plaintiff look silly. :-P
Ec