On 13/08/07, Casey Brown cbrown1023.ml@gmail.com wrote:
David, the whole thing really is nonsense. I'm not sure why we are wasting our time.
There appears to be an expectations violation. That' s what I'd really like to see stated in detail, more than "someone's doing magic I don't understand - it might be bad for me, so it must be stopped!" which is what it reads like so far.
But I'm sure the complainants can clearly state their expectations in detail and how and why they are violated, preferably in a way that shows they actually know what checkuser access does in practice. That would make this a useful and productive thread.
- d.