On 13/08/07, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml(a)gmail.com> wrote:
David, the whole thing really is nonsense. I'm
not sure why we are wasting
our time.
There appears to be an expectations violation. That' s what I'd really
like to see stated in detail, more than "someone's doing magic I don't
understand - it might be bad for me, so it must be stopped!" which is
what it reads like so far.
But I'm sure the complainants can clearly state their expectations in
detail and how and why they are violated, preferably in a way that
shows they actually know what checkuser access does in practice. That
would make this a useful and productive thread.
- d.