Can you be more specific? Why would the WMF need to legally support an admin.
Mgm
On 4/19/07, Info Control infodmz@gmail.com wrote:
Or are admins on their own legally? An authorized WMF agent needs to answer this... rather than random people guessing based on what ifs and maybes (as is happening on the Brandt discussion).
Would admins acting as agents of WP be covered in any way? If not, why? Maybe its time this was defined for the safety, protection, and knowledge of any admins. I'm terribly afraid that the WMF will not do a thing to not risk losing claimed and still untested Sec. 230 immunity in the United States. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l