Can you be more specific? Why would the WMF need to legally support an
admin.
Mgm
On 4/19/07, Info Control <infodmz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Or are admins on their own legally? An authorized WMF agent needs to
answer
this... rather than random people guessing based on what ifs and maybes
(as
is happening on the Brandt discussion).
Would admins acting as agents of WP be covered in any way? If not, why?
Maybe its time this was defined for the safety, protection, and knowledge
of
any admins. I'm terribly afraid that the WMF will not do a thing to not
risk
losing claimed and still untested Sec. 230 immunity in the United States.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l