On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
If someone started a new article on the Dalai Lama that said he eats babies, we would delete it like a shot. We would not ''undelete'' it in order to write a new, sourced article. That would be pointless and stupid.
I looked at that discussion. People disagree with you over not counting sources as sources. It would not be possible to create an article that says the Dalai Lama eats babies and is sourced; apparently, this article *is* sourced, making the comparison inapt. We also don't delete articles for BLP reasons when the person complains about sourced information.