On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
If someone started a new article on the Dalai Lama
that said he eats
babies, we would delete it like a shot. We would not ''undelete'' it
in order to write a new, sourced article. That would be pointless and
stupid.
I looked at that discussion. People disagree with you over not counting
sources as sources. It would not be possible to create an article that
says the Dalai Lama eats babies and is sourced; apparently, this article
*is* sourced, making the comparison inapt. We also don't delete articles
for BLP reasons when the person complains about sourced information.