Well, I'm sure 1000 sysops dedicated to the task could do it, but we simply can't afford to dedicate a sysop to a specific task unless we sign up another 100 to make sure the 1000 don't make any mistakes, and yet another 100 to cover the gap left by the 100 who were originally sysops and were promoted to bureaucrat to handle the rights allocation of 1000 sysops, yet another 100 to refine policy so that less experienced users can work more efficiently and take care of the work not done by the 1300 odd who are now dedicated to sysop tasks...
On 9/5/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 9/4/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:24:07 -0400, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Yeah, he said it doesn't seem to be working, and it's not open. So when is this policy change going to be reverted?
Right after we can sign up another thousand admins to deal with the flood-tide of crap articles that anons create?
How many more admins do you *really* think it would take. Certainly not 1000. Surely the 3 or 4 more clicks it takes to create a crap article now aren't stopping that many anons. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l