Well, I'm sure 1000 sysops dedicated to the task could do it, but we
simply can't afford to dedicate a sysop to a specific task unless we
sign up another 100 to make sure the 1000 don't make any mistakes, and
yet another 100 to cover the gap left by the 100 who were originally
sysops and were promoted to bureaucrat to handle the rights allocation
of 1000 sysops, yet another 100 to refine policy so that less
experienced users can work more efficiently and take care of the work
not done by the 1300 odd who are now dedicated to sysop tasks...
On 9/5/06, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 9/4/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:24:07 -0400, Anthony
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
Yeah, he said it doesn't seem to be working,
and it's not open. So
when is this policy change going to be reverted?
Right after we can sign up another thousand admins to deal with the
flood-tide of crap articles that anons create?
How many more admins do you *really* think it would take. Certainly
not 1000. Surely the 3 or 4 more clicks it takes to create a crap
article now aren't stopping that many anons.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l