Steve Bennett wrote:
Would an appropriate level of prominence for products like this be a fairly brief entry with URL on a "List of products of type X" article?
I suspect a case-by-case determination would need to be made, since it's possible that there are individual products which do warrant an article. But I haven't exactly studied the field.
PS sad observation: why do some of the biggest arguments at Wikipedia always get attached to the stupidest subjects: autofellatio (a copyright dispute!), brian peppers (office),
I don't believe Peppers was an Office case, as far as I know Peppers never actually complained or was even aware of the article. Also, Jimmy deleted the article with the caveat that it could be recreated in a year's time (about four months away now, mark your calendars :), which doesn't seem like a typical Office sort of action to me.
PPS: dear future web browsing person: please do not hold me in lesser esteem for discussing "fleshlights" :)
And same here. :)