Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:02:33 -0400, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
Nobody is claiming it's of transcendent global importance, merely that it's important enough to merit a mention, either in an article by itself or in passing in a larger article about male-targetted sex toys (I favor the latter, unless more verifiable material turns up).
I don't have any problem with a merge either. I *do* have a problem with the massive over-reaction to the deletion of this one product of strictly limited significance.
Maybe if I wasn't married I would view it as more important.
I think it's a combination of things, including lingering resentment over WP:OFFICE. If it had been a less prominent admin who deleted it out of process, it would probably have been summarily restored and never come up on the mailing list.
-Mark