Hi, this is just a quick response to slimvirgins post regarding saladin.
Just a note It was slim virgin who repeatedly reverted my posts in the zionist page, and so his views are clearly subjective.
storng POV - I think everyone on the zionist thread has a strong POV, without exception.
poor research and writing skills - quoting the talmud on the three oaths, and citing the most acedemic and researched account of the history of zionsm by the itv middle east journalist Alan Hart. Is not evidence of poor research. Clearly this is an extremely subjective point of view
original research - this is a false accusation. There was NO original research, everything was references and cited. If I am wrong you need to give the evidence
Dodgy websites - according to whom
Use of anon IP to violate 3RR - same ipp address and browser does not necessarily mean it is the same user. Computers are shared and , one does not turn turn the internet of before someone else uses it.
copyright violations - again this is a false charge. I have asked jaygy to produce evidence of this copy right violations , which he should have to hand as this was one of the reasons for banning. So far none have been forthcoming
no useful edits - this is higly subjective
so as a summary there is a long list of unsubstantiated claims, most of which are highly subjective. Could the reason for a request of a permanent ban be that slimvirgin is opposed to the factual evidence i provided on the zionist page, the same factual evidene that was repeatedly removed.
Wikipedia should be an online encyclopedia that provides a broad range of factual information on subjects, not a conformance to a certain groups POV.
From: slimvirgin@gmail.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Unblock request Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:04:07 -0500
On 5/19/06, Mark Wagner carnildo@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/19/06, Ryan Delaney ryan.delaney@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/19/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a little too long, yes. I'll see if Jaiyg can tell me more about the copyvio he claimed
saladin
made.
Even a copyvio doesn't justify an indefinite block here. This isn't
simple
vandalism and there's no way we can consider this guy community
banned.
Repeated, persistent copyright violations *is* grounds for an indefinite
block.
This is a single-issue editor who has arrived with a very strong POV and is determined to push it, has very poor research and writing skills, deletes legitimate material, inserts original research, misuses primary sources, uses dodgy websites as secondary sources, uses an anon IP to violate 3RR, violates copyright, and makes (so far as I can tell) no useful edits. So why is his indefinite block being reversed. Is Ryan prepared to mentor him?
Sarah _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________ Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters