Hi, this is just a quick response to slimvirgins post regarding saladin.
Just a note It was slim virgin who repeatedly reverted my posts in the
zionist page, and so his views are clearly subjective.
storng POV - I think everyone on the zionist thread has a strong POV,
poor research and writing skills - quoting the talmud on the three oaths,
and citing the most acedemic and researched account of the history of zionsm
by the itv middle east journalist Alan Hart. Is not evidence of poor
research. Clearly this is an extremely subjective point of view
original research - this is a false accusation. There was NO original
research, everything was references and cited. If I am wrong you need to
give the evidence
Dodgy websites - according to whom
Use of anon IP to violate 3RR - same ipp address and browser does not
necessarily mean it is the same user. Computers are shared and , one does
not turn turn the internet of before someone else uses it.
copyright violations - again this is a false charge. I have asked jaygy to
produce evidence of this copy right violations , which he should have to
hand as this was one of the reasons for banning. So far none have been
no useful edits - this is higly subjective
so as a summary there is a long list of unsubstantiated claims, most of
which are highly subjective.
Could the reason for a request of a permanent ban be that slimvirgin is
opposed to the factual evidence i provided on the zionist page, the same
factual evidene that was repeatedly removed.
Wikipedia should be an online encyclopedia that provides a broad range of
factual information on subjects, not a conformance to a certain groups POV.
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Unblock request
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:04:07 -0500
On 5/19/06, Mark Wagner <carnildo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/19/06, Ryan Delaney
> On 5/19/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps a little too long,
> > I'll see if Jaiyg can tell me more about the copyvio he claimed
> > made.
> Even a copyvio doesn't justify
an indefinite block here. This isn't
> vandalism and there's no way we can
consider this guy community
Repeated, persistent copyright violations *is* grounds for an indefinite
This is a single-issue editor who has
arrived with a very strong POV
and is determined to push it, has very poor research and writing
skills, deletes legitimate material, inserts original research,
misuses primary sources, uses dodgy websites as secondary sources,
uses an anon IP to violate 3RR, violates copyright, and makes (so far
as I can tell) no useful edits. So why is his indefinite block being
reversed. Is Ryan prepared to mentor him?
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters!