I disagree with your first point. There are two jewish views of political zionism one for and one against. The site i gave is the one against which has less following, but is still valid, and the page referenced to cites the talmud and the scholars view of talmud, so it is entirely a valid source
the second source , using a wikipedia link - ok i was not aware of this, someone could have told me that you are not allowed to use wikipedia as references before i was banned indefinatly.
the third source, once again i was unaware that personal websites cannot be used as a source. Given i have only been editing for 3 days, it would have only been fair to have pointed this out to me before banning me indefinately.
The last point, why is a persons religious and ethnic background not relevant to a wiki site on a person. Any references or sources , however slim have claimed he was jewish. One should be asking why certain people were vehmently opposed to listing his religious and ethnic background
as for the sockpuppet, that is my explanation given, it is not entirely far fetched . When two people work together and one asks the other to help, on a certain view, then of course they will edit where appropriate. Am i not to be given the benefit of the doubt? Or even warned that this could constitute violation of the 3RRs , at least before I was banned indefinately
p.s All the section I wrote, can easily be referenced from what wikipedia deem appropriate references as it is all factual and undisputed
From: slimvirgin@gmail.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] blocked for a week for these edits Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:09:44 -0500
On 5/20/06, abu hamza abuhamza1970@hotmail.com wrote:
So here is my defense. at the moment i am on trial for one week . ref 1threeoaths
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/3strongoaths.cfm
ref 2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Turkey ref 3 http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/ch17jeru.html
The first source is the "dodgy website" I referred to earlier. It's an extreme partisan website. It should not be used as a source.
The second is Wikipedia. It's not allowed to be used as a source in our articles, for obvious reasons.
The third is a personal website http://www.fsmitha.com/about.html -- also not allowed.
The use of poor sources should be placed in the context of you trying to add six times to the introduction of [[Harold Shipman]], the British doctor who murdered his patients, that he was Jewish or that his mother was a Jewish asylum seeker, without a source, although even with one, why is that fact so relevant to his notability that it has to go in the intro?
Plus the reverting with a sockpuppet, or, if you prefer, a workmate with the same IP and same browser, who reverts to the same version of the same page just in time to stop you from violating 3RR.
Sarah _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________ Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview