I disagree with your first point. There are two jewish views of political
zionism one for and one against. The site i gave is the one against which
has less following, but is still valid, and the page referenced to cites the
talmud and the scholars view of talmud, so it is entirely a valid source
the second source , using a wikipedia link - ok i was not aware of this,
someone could have told me that you are not allowed to use wikipedia as
references before i was banned indefinatly.
the third source, once again i was unaware that personal websites cannot be
used as a source. Given i have only been editing for 3 days, it would have
only been fair to have pointed this out to me before banning me
indefinately.
The last point, why is a persons religious and ethnic background not
relevant to a wiki site on a person. Any references or sources , however
slim have claimed he was jewish. One should be asking why certain people
were vehmently opposed to listing his religious and ethnic background
as for the sockpuppet, that is my explanation given, it is not entirely far
fetched . When two people work together and one asks the other to help, on a
certain view, then of course they will edit where appropriate. Am i not to
be given the benefit of the doubt? Or even warned that this could constitute
violation of the 3RRs , at least before I was banned indefinately
p.s All the section I wrote, can easily be referenced from what wikipedia
deem appropriate references as it is all factual and undisputed
From: slimvirgin(a)gmail.com
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] blocked for a week for these edits
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:09:44 -0500
On 5/20/06, abu hamza <abuhamza1970(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
So here is my defense. at the moment i am on
trial for one week .
ref 1threeoaths
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/zionism/3strongoaths.cfm
The first source is the "dodgy website" I referred to earlier. It's an
extreme partisan website. It should not be used as a source.
The second is Wikipedia. It's not allowed to be used as a source in
our articles, for obvious reasons.
The third is a personal website
http://www.fsmitha.com/about.html --
also not allowed.
The use of poor sources should be placed in the context of you trying
to add six times to the introduction of [[Harold Shipman]], the
British doctor who murdered his patients, that he was Jewish or that
his mother was a Jewish asylum seeker, without a source, although even
with one, why is that fact so relevant to his notability that it has
to go in the intro?
Plus the reverting with a sockpuppet, or, if you prefer, a workmate
with the same IP and same browser, who reverts to the same version of
the same page just in time to stop you from violating 3RR.
Sarah
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger
7.5 today!
http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview