Scott Stevenson wrote:
On 6/5/06, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
Resid Gulerdem wrote:
The admins are only part of the community now and will stay like that in the future, as far as I can see. Are some modifications needed in your opinion? I believe the answer is yes. I do not know if you could see the proposal [[WP:OURS]] I posted on this list recently. I think it can be useful and can be developed further. I tried to outline some important points which may reduce the conflicts between the admins and the users. If you saw it, do you think it is feasible?
I see no reference to WP:OURS in google, so I am unable to comment. Can you send it to me?
I've just created the proposed policy on [[Wikipedia:OURS]].
Permanently blocked editors formulating policy on Wikipedia is BAD. I've submitted this policy for deletion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:OUR...
Congratulations Netscott!
You've successfully killed this proposal on the first day merely for personal reasons rather than its own merits. Did you even bother to read the proposal?
You are really good in your smear campaigning. Why don't you write a guide so everybody can learn how to do that? If you continue, you'll probably get me indef-banned for being another meat-puppet of Resid.
Just one thing: As you might know, I have to read your texts as well, so would you please refrain from repeating yourself so many times. It really gets boring to read the same words over and over again. Please try to be a little bit more creative. I.e. you could try to use words like "disruption" or "proxy" only once in your messages.