On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:07:18 -0500, you wrote: As noted, it's in here as a thread. It starts with this: 'Content disputes' are one of the main dispute type encountered. To avoid that, users need to follow well-established ethics and standards of Wikipedia (e.g. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rgulerdem/Wikiethics]) That "well-established standard" is the soundly rejected [[Wikipedia:Wikiethics]] proposal, which was essentially a proposal to allow censorship, and the "problem" to be fixed is that admins block tendentious and incivil users. Guy (JzG) -- http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG

Permanently blocked editors formulating policy on Wikipedia is BAD. I've submitted this policy for deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:OU… -Scott Stevenson [[User:Netscott]] On 6/5/06, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:

Raphael Wegmann, There's a reason that speedy deletion general criteria #5 exists. [[WP:CSD#General_criteria]] You can be sure that such a rule is equally applicable even when such a page is created by a proxy for a banned user. <snip> words like "disruption" or "proxy" only once in your messages. </snip> I understand why you are resorting to [[ad hominem]] attacks as it is evident that you haven't got much else to argue with. <snip> meat-puppet of Resid. </snip> There's only one individual who'll get themselves indef-banned here Raphael... and that's yourself. Sincerely, -Scott Stevenson [[User:Netscott]] Congratulations Netscott!

Raphael, I didn't consider what you wrote as a personal attack but was just illustrating that rather than try to argue in support of what you were saying relative to this entire series of discussions you chose to try and argue about myself and how I have supported my own arguments. Nevertheless your good faith gesture is appreciated. You should know as well that my referring to you as a proxy in these discussions is not a personal attack but is a descriptive noun relative to your actions. The defintion of proxy that is most applicable to my utilization of the word from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=proxy is: n. 1. A person authorized to act for another; an agent or substitute. In effect through discussions here, Resid Gulerdem authorized you to act on his behalf and create his policy proposal [[WP:OURS]]. Therefore, when you created [[WP:OURS]] you became his proxy. Do you see how that isn't a personal attack? Sincerely, Scott Stevenson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Netscott On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann &lt;raphael(a)psi.co.at&gt; wrote:

Raphael, This discussion is now beyond the scope of this mailing list. If you want to continue this I suggest you write me on my talk page. Sincerely, -Scott Stevenson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Netscott On 6/6/06, Raphael Wegmann &lt;raphael(a)psi.co.at&gt; wrote: