I am recused on VeryVerily's case as I have had trouble with the same aggressive point of view editors he is butting heads with, editors dedicated to whitewashing the history of totalitarian Communist activities. VeryVerily ought to be able to edit provided he is reasonably courteous, offers information from reliable references and does not engage in sterile edit warring. Sterile edit warring is reverting just to make a point. He ought to be judged by his current behavior, not events which occurred in 2004. Arbitrators who feel that a strong conservative point of view ought not to be expressed should have recused themselves.
Fred
On Feb 26, 2006, at 8:52 PM, VeryVerily wrote:
So please anyone who has time take a look and comment. I was a huge contributor before, and I see so much that needs to be done and want to pitch in. But they'd have me edit as a second-class editor deprived of legitimacy and vulnerable to arbitrary blocking. With no justification for making me one.
Thanks if you're still reading,
VV