I am recused on VeryVerily's case as I have had trouble with the same
aggressive point of view editors he is butting heads with, editors
dedicated to whitewashing the history of totalitarian Communist
activities. VeryVerily ought to be able to edit provided he is
reasonably courteous, offers information from reliable references and
does not engage in sterile edit warring. Sterile edit warring is
reverting just to make a point. He ought to be judged by his current
behavior, not events which occurred in 2004. Arbitrators who feel
that a strong conservative point of view ought not to be expressed
should have recused themselves.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 8:52 PM, VeryVerily wrote:
So please anyone who has time take a look and comment.
I was a huge
contributor before, and I see so much that needs to be done and want
to pitch in. But they'd have me edit as a second-class editor
legitimacy and vulnerable to arbitrary blocking. With no
for making me one.
Thanks if you're still reading,