On 2/15/06, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote:
So if someone removes something from any Wikipedia article and I restore it, I'm guilty of plagiarism? IANAL, but I can't imagine that DG is guilty of anything improper in this case, esp. if he says what he's doing in his edit summaries.
Plagiarism has nothing to do with law, and is totally about misrepresentation. So if DG is not misrepresenting the reason for the edits, and is not claiming that he wrote the material, there is no issue.
Steve