On 2/15/06, Rob <gamaliel8(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So if someone removes something from any Wikipedia
article and I restore it,
I'm guilty of plagiarism? IANAL, but I can't imagine that DG is guilty of
anything improper in this case, esp. if he says what he's doing in his edit
summaries.
Plagiarism has nothing to do with law, and is totally about
misrepresentation. So if DG is not misrepresenting the reason for the
edits, and is not claiming that he wrote the material, there is no
issue.
Steve