"Conrad Dunkerson" wrote
charles matthews wrote:
Sorry, I just switch off when people start up with the 'given a pass' talk. I don't think there was ever a question raised against David Gerard's judgement. If you can't see why, it's the end of the conversation.
Oh, I think I can see why, but yes... that'd be the end of the conversation.
Just for everyone else, then. There is no 'moral equivalence' about it. This has been about content and form, and those puzzled presumably thought that sticking to 'form', and disregarding what was really happening, was somehow OK.
The ArbCom is as sane as ever, and has a perfectly good mandate to act here.
Charles