"Conrad Dunkerson" wrote
charles matthews wrote:
Sorry, I just switch off when people start up
with the 'given a pass'
talk. I don't think there was ever a question raised against David
Gerard's judgement. If you can't see why, it's the end of the
Oh, I think I can see why, but yes... that'd be the end of the
Just for everyone else, then. There is no 'moral equivalence' about it.
This has been about content and form, and those puzzled presumably thought
that sticking to 'form', and disregarding what was really happening, was
The ArbCom is as sane as ever, and has a perfectly good mandate to act here.