On 2/3/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/3/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia's still great, I love it, but really. The Wikipedia Counter Vandalism Unit?
Let's just strap on the jackboots and start humming Beethoven's 5th.
Silly, silly me, thinking the Wikipedia Militia was bad. They've even got their own freaking logo! Which, if I'm not mistaken, is a gross copyright vio.
Sure but we tend not to worry about that as long as it stays within wikimedia projects. Otherwise there are rather a lot of othr images that need to go.
Maybe it's time to start enforcing the rules. It seems a bit odd to have rule-enforcers breaking rules.
"Semi-protection" is also something that bothers me no end. As does the concept of needing to "semi-protect" talk pages.
Wikipedia doesn't need protection. It needs participation. It's not a piece of china, folks.
Ummm are you going to sit there refreshing your talk page once a second to catch all the vandalism at GWB?
Nope!