On 2/3/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/3/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Wikipedia's still great, I love it, but
really. The Wikipedia Counter
Vandalism Unit?
Let's just strap on the jackboots and start humming Beethoven's 5th.
Silly, silly me, thinking the Wikipedia Militia was bad. They've even
got their own freaking logo! Which, if I'm not mistaken, is a gross
copyright vio.
Sure but we tend not to worry about that as long as it stays within
wikimedia projects. Otherwise there are rather a lot of othr images
that need to go.
Maybe it's time to start enforcing the rules. It seems a bit odd to
have rule-enforcers breaking rules.
"Semi-protection" is also something that bothers me no end. As does
the concept of needing to "semi-protect" talk pages.
Wikipedia doesn't need protection. It needs participation. It's not a
piece of china, folks.
Ummm are you going to sit there refreshing your talk page once a
second to catch all the vandalism at GWB?
Nope!