On 12/16/06, Earle Martin wikipedia@downlode.org wrote:
I have no idea where you got the idea that I was asking the Foundation to be responsible for other people's actions.
That's how it seemed from putting what you said in the context of the other two posts.
My reading of the conversation: Guy was wondering why he hadn't heard any answers from Danny in regard to fairly specific questions he had asked about what he could or could not do to the page. Matthew suggested one reason would be that Danny doesn't want it on record that the Foundation has said "yes you can add this to an article" or similar statements, because the Foundation doesn't want to be accountable for what editors do in that type of situation.
So when you mentioned accountability, I thought you were following the same line that Matthew had followed. Sorry if that's not what you meant.