On 01/12/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/1/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The *breadth* of en:wp's coverage is actually a reason I've heard from many who speak another language natively for preferring en:wp as a reference - there's more likely to be something, anything, on a given subject here than anywhere else, and a better something than you'd get from a Google search. Our breadth is a strength, not a weakness. We don't have to have a 30,000-byte article on something to be a useful source on it.
Are you willing to stick your neck out and say whether a two-sentence stub on GNAA is a good thing or a bad thing?
I never particularly objected to the article's existence and voted "keep" each time it came up, particularly as there were quite a few people keeping an eye on it.
- d.