On 01/12/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/1/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes. The *breadth* of en:wp's coverage is
actually a reason I've heard
> from many who speak another language natively for preferring en:wp as
> a reference - there's more likely to be something, anything, on a
> given subject here than anywhere else, and a better something than
> you'd get from a Google search.
> Our breadth is a strength, not a weakness. We don't have to have a
> 30,000-byte article on something to be a useful source on it.
Are you willing to stick your neck out and say whether
a two-sentence
stub on GNAA is a good thing or a bad thing?
I never particularly objected to the article's existence and voted
"keep" each time it came up, particularly as there were quite a few
people keeping an eye on it.
- d.