On 6/24/06, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
We're slowly reaching at least basic completeness in some fields; a lot of the missing-articles lists are beginning to top out. There's still a long way to go, though.
It would be fascinating to see a global view of this. I know we have a lot of WikiProjects that track completeness in indivdiual fields, but a way of combining these into an overall view, like "Politicians: UK 20% missing, 60% stub, 20% advanced" or something, would be amazing. It would also be then interesting to compare that "top down" view with a "bottom up" view, whereby articles are sampled at random for quality and to see what domains they belong to.
Steve