On 6/24/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We're slowly reaching at least basic completeness
in some fields; a
lot of the missing-articles lists are beginning to top out. There's
still a long way to go, though.
It would be fascinating to see a global view of this. I know we have a
lot of WikiProjects that track completeness in indivdiual fields, but
a way of combining these into an overall view, like "Politicians: UK
20% missing, 60% stub, 20% advanced" or something, would be amazing.
It would also be then interesting to compare that "top down" view with
a "bottom up" view, whereby articles are sampled at random for quality
and to see what domains they belong to.
Steve