On 10/27/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
The twoversions template didn't say anything about
what
the _nature_ of the dispute between the two versions was, and it doesn't
give any indication that the two-version situation is good or permanent
(perhaps more emphasis can be added when it's restored that it's only a
temporary measure), so I don't think it'll be a tool for POV-splitting
articles in the long run. Perhaps if someone thinks it might be they
should check the articles that use it to see how long the template's
been in use on each.
The problem with {{twoversions}} is when it becomes a way of life for
the article.
Too bad we can't rig it so the template explodes after seven days.
Kelly