-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 geni wrote: I have to concur. There are plenty of disputes over "facts" - I requested page protection for such an article the other day. I propose re-creating {{twoversions}} as: "The editors of this article are crazy and will be shot as soon as a rouge admin finds them. (Look, there's one! Under the big pile of hay in the barn! Quick, before 'e gets away! CHARGE!!!!!!1)" - -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \

Tony Sidaway wrote: I've used it too, though darned if I can remember what the article was at this point. The twoversions template didn't say anything about what the _nature_ of the dispute between the two versions was, and it doesn't give any indication that the two-version situation is good or permanent (perhaps more emphasis can be added when it's restored that it's only a temporary measure), so I don't think it'll be a tool for POV-splitting articles in the long run. Perhaps if someone thinks it might be they should check the articles that use it to see how long the template's been in use on each.

On 10/27/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote: The problem with {{twoversions}} is when it becomes a way of life for the article. Too bad we can't rig it so the template explodes after seven days. Kelly

On 10/28/05, Alphax <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote: I've got a whole array of gmail account stacked up for the eventuality that one day their filtering system will become Turing-complete. I'm patient...