On 05/06/04 19:49, Fred Bauder wrote:
From: David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au>
>On 05/06/04 13:40, KNOTT, T wrote:
>>The general consensus appears to be the
quickpolls do not appear to work in
>>the case of violations of the three revert rule. Fair enough. So what do we
>>do now? I would like admins to have the power to 24hour block someone who
>>violates this rule, once they have received a warning. I personally can't see
>>any situation where someone would have a legitimate reason to revert more
>>than three times in a day.
>>Vandalism - protect the page.
>>Um what else? I can't think of anything. What does everyone else think?
>That's a sweet thought, but 24.45.99.191 has
been going hogwild
>with (a) spamming large slabs of text across the place (b) altering
>archives of talk pages yesterday and today. I put it on the
>Vandalism page, but it doesn't seem to warrant any action. Just
>what does it take for an anon IP vandal to get blocked?
This is Paul Vogel who is a hairbreath short of a 1
year ban. He has only
hours, perhaps minutes to go. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paul
Vogel]].
Yes, I know it is. So you're saying it takes four months for an anon IP
vandal to get blocked?
- d.